Wednesday, February 18, 2009

For the Love of the Game?

By Phil Ferguson

I’ve always watched interviews with the big stars of the day, those who are constantly in the limelight, whose professional contracts are absurd, making sometimes 5 to 10 million dollars per year. I am astounded at how often I hear that they ask for more, and they protest that their contract does not measure up to their talent and current performance. There are foreign players that are now flocking to the NBA in droves, perhaps because of their need for competitive play in the country that is the powerhouse of basketball in the world. This is true, I am sure, for a certain percentage of players who truly play for the love of the game. However, there is nearly always a driving force behind dramatic, intercontinental moves.And its color is almost certainly green.There was a time when kids would play in gyms around the country with the goal of having fun or passing the time, where kids would slip and slide in old sneakers on dusty courts. Now always is the standing message that if you’re good enough to go to the NBA you’ve got it made, no more financial worries. Imagine, for one second, AAU leagues in which kids didn’t always run around newly waxed hardwood floors in the brand new Nike or Reebok shoe. Imagine that you could turn on ESPN and watch an entire hour without a single notion of players who are complaining because their 2 million a year just doesn’t cut it, that owners need to up the ante or watch their stars become fresh meat on the trade markets in the middle of the season.Idealistic, eh?Perhaps, but were ever the barriers of the social norm broken with limited thinking? If David Stern took to the podium with media’s cameras flashing and announced that the NBA would continue without offering their players or coaches a salary, immediately the league would crumble because of the flight of both crucial parties. Profits would plummet, jobs would vanish, and whole stadiums would close. But what if some stayed? What if there were players, not necessarily stars, but players nonetheless, who remained in the weight room, on the track, working out to play the game they love. And what if some coaches kept the dry-erase boards in hand and the play books fresh? These would be perhaps a handful, but each of them would share the idea that The Game is still just a game, and meant to be played that way. And maybe, just maybe, the courts would fill again, and the empty benches replaced with occupied seats. Sure they’d play in community gyms, and yeah maybe they’d all have to work day jobs. But really, is there an alternative to a money-oriented league with greedy players and cheating referees? Perhaps what I suggest is impossible, but so was flight and men walking on the moon. If there’s one thing I have learned from watching professional sports today, it is that the really sincere men and women don’t need to hold numerous press conferences to profess their financial woes, or their lack of concern about their pay. Funny thing about the latter too. The final lesson here I think, is that to remember one commonly perpetuated lie. Whenever someone says it is not about the money, it is only too painfully obvious that it is all about the money.

6 comments:

  1. i rather see that money in the players pockets than in the owners pockets arguing that players get payed to much makes now sense because professional sports for the most part is a free market system so owners will pay as much money for a player as long as they make him a profit

    ReplyDelete
  2. Although I do agree with the fact that players are way overpaid, not paying them would take away the concept of PROFESSIONAL basketball, the concept of which, is find the best players in the world, those good enough that they are worth paying to make your team look good/ play well. I do not however think that this ideology is still held, a problem with many of the major pro sports.

    ReplyDelete
  3. and why does monetary gain have to be associated with being good? it wasn't always like that, this concept is a modern societal construct. Professional basketball should be about playing at the highest level because you are good enough to stand on that high tier as that kind of player...professional sports only has a financial connotation because we as money-driven humans made it that way.

    ReplyDelete
  4. are you suggesting we not pay athletes alot of money players because if we dont then all that money goes to the owners. people are paying a ton of money to go see the teams play and TV stations are paying money to have to right to televise the games. i rather see the money put in the pockets of professionals who work their entire childhood towards the goal of becoming the top of their fields. what you are proposing is to basically cut off professional sports from the free market system which goes against the principles of the united states.

    ReplyDelete
  5. while i dont always agree on the principles of the united states (lets save this 4 another day gentlemen shall we? meaning no arguments about this...after all this is a sports blog)
    i do agree with the great man known as nate
    the players just like every employees in every other business are payed proportionally to what the market allows...the players do a ton of work and have a job in which billions of dollars are made...due to this they deserve the millions..sure some players are all about the $$$ or so it seems..but so are the owners and in every sport one freak play or bad decision (mike vick u there?) ends ur career and cuts u off from the millions u were making..also, if $$ motivaties u 2 b the best u can be, so be it...once a player loses his ability/quits working hard there is another waiting in the wings to take his/her job

    ReplyDelete
  6. Professional sports are part of the entertainment industry. I wonder: does Phil get outraged at the millions paid per movie to professional actors, directors and producers, or does he just reserve his ire for professional athletes?

    This Utopian Sports World that Phil describes exists: its called amateur sports. And if that's the kind of sports Phil wants to consume (a fan is a consumer of sports for entertainment) then he should do so. Stop watching ESPN, stop reading SI and sports page, stop rockin' the authentic jerseys and start getting your sports fix from local, amateur sporting events. There are a ton of them out there.

    ReplyDelete