
The Kufere Laing Lounge
Sports, sports, sports and... more sports. oh and sometimes we discuss sports. and sports.
Before the semifinal match of the Confederations Cup, many had already marked down the Spanish national soccer team, ranked number one in the world by FIFA, as the winners over the United States. But they couldn't be farther than right, as the underdog American team pulled off a huge upset in a 2-0 win.
I'm going to admit it, I'm no soccer genius. I don't know much strategy, if any at all, and most of what I know comes from playing the video game Fifa 08. But I did notice a few things during the game today.
The game was very physical, lots of tackles and rough play. It seemed like Spain had a ton of scoring opportunities throughout the first half, but their stars like Fernando Torres just couldnt take advantage. America played like it was running solely on adrenaline and emotion, while Spain's calm and relaxed play eventually became too calm and relax, resulting in costly mistakes. The American defense, although it occasionally lapsed, played pretty well, and made Torres ineffective. The physical American play was too much for the more finesse Spaniards.
Because I don't know much about soccer strategy, I also focused on some other things in the game. First of all, I think soccer gets a bad rap for "taking too long." However, I thought the game today moved along very nicely. The 90 minutes of play seemed much quicker that it actually was. The referees often let the players play through things that could have been called as penalties. The refs, except for one horrid call (giving American Michael Bradley a red card for a slide tackle that should've been only a yellow in the 86th minute), I thought were pretty good. However, this is in comparison to the zebras of popular American sports, which I often find myself yelling at through the T.V.
Also, I thought the jerseys were really sweet, especially for Spain. I like the dark piping coming down from the neck, and I think the red, gold and black all end up making a very nice uniform. Kudos to Adidas. The American ones were pretty good too; simple, but they look good. American football teams could learn a thing or two about uniforms from these soccer teams. I mean really, would you rather have your team wear this or this?
The overall production of the game by ESPN and fifa.com was better than most American sporting events. The camera work was good, and I thought the announcers were good. And by good, I mean not stupid and annoying like many commentators are nowadays. I think the fifa.com internet gamecast was one of the best things I've ever witnessed on the internet. FIFA went into great detail about what was happening in the plays. Such phrases like "glorious attempt by Dempsey just goes off target" and "heroic defense by the Americans" were common. And when play slowed down, blurbs about how the Spaniards must continue to attack Tim Howard popped up. If only American football gamecasts were like this, instead of "3 yard rush by Clinton Portis." I'd like to see "glorious attempt to break through into the open field by Portis goes for a mere three yards, due to heroic tackling by Brian Urlacher. If the Chicago defensive unit can keep this superb play up, they may be able to fantastically win this game against Washington." Heck, even the live fan chats are more intelligent. There's no spam about finding your true love just by entering your social security code here, but real talk about what's happening in the game by fans. Whoever writes the gamecast updates for fifa.com should get a substantive raise, in my opinion.
Another thing I liked about this game was that the players played hard for all 90 minutes and some. In many other sports, near the end of the game, many players just give up if they think their team's deficit is too large to make up, especially in American football. But in soccer, these players were playing it tough all the way until the whistle. Even in stoppage time, Spanish players continued to attack the U.S., and the Americans kept making tackles. I liked that a lot about this match.
After watching this game, a glorious upset by the American squad, led by the heroics of Clint Dempsey, Jozy Altidore and Tim Howard, makes me, along with many other Americans, want to watch more soccer. This victory is most likely the biggest in American soccer history, and may remind you of the Miracle on Ice, when the underdog American hockey team knocked off the juggernaut Soviet Union. On Sunday, when the U.S. takes on either South Africa or Brazil for the Confederations Cup title, expect many Americans to be watching the U.S. try to finish off a glorious run that would earn American soccer a lot of respect from the rest of the soccer world and America itself.
(image h/t: foxsports.com)
By Eric Y
A couple days ago, it was made known that former baseball player Sammy Sosa had tested positive for performance-enhancing drugs in 2003. He has long been suspected of taking steroids, but this is the first hard evidence. Sosa was one of the best home run hitters of all time, slugging 608 in his career, placing him sixth on the all-time list. But the positive tests raises suspicions: how many of those home runs were the product of steroids? How would he have performed without steroids? Its hard to decide whether or not Sosa should be enshrined in Cooperstown.
There are other cases like Sosa’s, notably Mark McGwire and Barry Bonds. McGwire famously chased the home run record in 1998 with Sosa, hitting 70 dingers, setting a new MLB record. But he has also faced a steroid controversy, ever since AP writer Steve Wilstein reported that McGwire had been using performance-enhancing drugs. Big Mac later admitted that he had used androstenedione, an over-the-counter muscle enhancer. However, he has never officially tested positive for steroids, nor was he named in the Mitchell Report. The same questions asked about Sosa must be asked about McGwire: how many of his 532 home runs, placing him eighth all-time, are a product of steroids?
The most difficult case is Barry Bonds. Bonds was an elite player in the MLB throughout the late 80’s and 90’s. Then, he reportedly started using steroids in 1999, and his home run totals skyrocketed, socking a record 72 in 2001. Bonds, the home-run king who hit 762 homers, had hall-of-fame stats before he started using steroids (445 homers, 460 stolen bases, 2010 hits); had he not used steroids, it is highly likely that Bonds would have still made it to Cooperstown. But steroids propelled him from a very good player to a monster. But because he took steroids, he still cheated. All his excellent play before he began allegedly using steroids in 1999 might go for naught.
My solution to this problem is simple: either they all get in to the hall of fame, or none of them get in. They all cheated. They all had excellent careers. We don’t know exactly how much of their stats should be attributed to illegal drugs. But with the way they look on paper now, they would all get in to Cooperstown if no one cared whether or not they used steroids.
In my opinion, you cant put Bonds and Sosa in and not McGwire, or McGwire and Bonds in and not Sosa, etc. Therefore, either you punish all of them by NOT allowing them into Cooperstown, or you forgive them and let ALL of them in. I think none of them should get in, but if Bonds gets voted in, then I think McGwire and Sosa must get in too. But the controversy will continue until next year, when McGwire has another shot to be enshrined in the hall of fame. We’ll just have to wait and see.
(image h/t: misunderestimation.com)
By Eric Y
On July 18, Ultimate Fighting Championship returns to its home of Las Vegas for the long-awaited hundredth championship. The headline bout of the night will feature defending heavyweight champ Brock Lesnar a.k.a. "The Next Big Thing" versus Frank Mir a.k.a. "The Baddest Man on the Planet." This fight will be a rematch from UFC 81, when Lesnar, in his first Ultimate Fighting match, was defeated by Mir. Now, both of them have risen to UFC stardom, and this rematch is considered the biggest event in Ultimate Fighting history.
The two fighters have been trash-talking each other while they await their dual. MMA Fanhouse reports that Mir said getting hit by Lesnar was "kind of like having your baby sister on your back and all over you, and you're just saying, 'Get off me.'" Lesnar told HDNet's Inside MMA that Mir won a "make-believe belt" in his victory over Antonio Rodrigo Nogueira for the interim heavyweight title last year. "He is the former champion but there's no ifs, ands or buts about it. I'm the current champion."
Lesnar has a significant physical advantage over Mir, weighing 20 pounds more and having a larger reach, and will try to overpower his opponent. His preferred style is wrestling and trying to pound whoever he is fighting into the mat. However, his defense is still a question mark; Mir's good technique could exploit it. The Baddest Man on the Planet, who says he has fully recovered from arthroscopic knee surgerythat kept him from fighting in UFC 98, is on a hot streak, winning his last three bouts. His jujitsu technique could capitalize on Lesnar's suspect defense.
Lesnar will have to avoid making any big mistakes that Mir could take advantage of. If he is able to wear him down early, Lesnar could use his brute strength to win the match. But don't expect this one to be done early; I expect this to be a tough, grind-it-out fight. I think Lesnar's power will be too much for the more technical Mir in UFC 100. All the hype and trash-talk won't be for nothing; this should be a great fight, and I'm looking forward to it.
(image h/t: cyberaxis.wordpress.com)